Beltway Battle of the Drones: Say you’re a military kind of guy, and you’d like to wrest control of the multi-billion dollar drone program run by the CIA and associated spy agencies (as reported Tuesday by The Daily Beast's Daniel Klaidman)? What better way to boost your case than to leak a report saying the spooks are spending too much time and money on the drone program and paramilitary operations, and not enough on intelligence gathering in the Middle East, China and other hotspots? Especially when it might well be true?
So it went Wednesday when a report from a “panel of White House advisors” that included now-Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and former Nebraska Sen. David L. Boren, a onetime chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, was obtained by The Washington Post’s Greg Miller. The panel, according to Miller, found that “the roles of the CIA, the National Security Agency and other spy services had been distorted by more than a decade of conflict.” To some, the squabble might seem as just more bickering among the services. Not to Boren, who asked, (sensibly, we think), "in the long run, what’s more important to America: Afghanistan or China?”
So it went Wednesday when a report from a “panel of White House advisors” that included now-Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and former Nebraska Sen. David L. Boren, a onetime chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, was obtained by The Washington Post’s Greg Miller. The panel, according to Miller, found that “the roles of the CIA, the National Security Agency and other spy services had been distorted by more than a decade of conflict.” To some, the squabble might seem as just more bickering among the services. Not to Boren, who asked, (sensibly, we think), "in the long run, what’s more important to America: Afghanistan or China?”